Peer Comments Paper 1(wasn’t around for paper 2)

Ideas-

Gave me a better insight onto the types of things readers are looking for when critically evaluating a narrative. This allowed be to improve the context of my ideas.

Evidence-

Gave good input on my usage of evidence and the context behind it, this helped me maintain a consistent type and rate in my writing.

Organization-

Not much was said about my organizing, but from what I gathered, I was able to better format my paper into a more professional and appropriate manner.

Local-

The general local comments certainly helped me fix minor mistakes and helped me critique aspects of writing beyond the specifics. Also let me know what I was doing well, and gave me more confidence in what I was doing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *