People often misconstrue the concept of a literacy narrative. It is often used to mislabel narrative pieces, and almost discredit those that do actually fall within these prerequisites. It is not difficult to identify those who are inappropriately labeled as victim narratives from those who clearly do qualify. In this analyzing of four literacy narratives, I showed two examples of what I feel were perfect examples of those who don’t fit versus those who do, as well as those who have moments where they certainly teeter on the edge, which often leads to mistakes being made while coding narratives. A deeper dive within the given texts of Alexander, Brandt, and Williams certainly allows any reader to be able to identify and code these narratives properly. Maybe having the freedom to analyze more data would prove beneficial for myself and other writers, as it would allow mutual freedom to have a greater input of information in order to make a more professional and cordial claim on these narratives.

By adding more depth and detail into my conclusion I feel that I was able to wrap it up in a much more effective manner, giving it a much better conclusion to draw towards. I added a final connection between the texts and narratives, tying in the reader as well, I hope this allows the reader of my essay to be able to understand the point I’m trying to push across here.